There are already many blogs about the pros and cons of using GPUs in VDI and SBC environments. I also would like to point out why I advise the usage of GPUs in these types of environments.
CPU vs. GPU
First, let me explain the difference between CPU and GPU. A CPU is designed to handle a few software threads at a time using its few cores and lots of memory cache. A GPU is designed to handle thousands of threads using their hundreds of cores.
In a production situation, the above difference means that when you have an application that wants to use a GPU but there isn’t one available, it will use the CPU instead. The downside of using a CPU is that it’s slower than a GPU and more expensive. A user can notice this when his programs are sluggish and not performing as expected. You can read more about the difference between a CPU and a GPU here.
VDI/SBC without GPU
In the early days, we had Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008R2 without a GPU and that would work perfectly. Users could do their work as if they were working on a local device. The architecture of the OS and most of the applications one was using, didn’t depend on a GPU. If they needed a graphics card and the server had none, Citrix offered a tool called OpenGL Software Accelerator and the VMware alternative was Soft 3D. This would work for some lightweight applications that required a graphics card and get fooled using the software.
In the last couple of years, we see increased usage of GPU accelerated programs like Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Dynamics, Teams, etc. Windows 10 is also more graphics-intensive than it was with Windows 7. A lot of applications already recommend or even require GPUs. They will function without a GPU but to get the best user experience (UX), you definitely should implement GPUs.
Maintaining the very best UX is exactly why I always advise the use of a GPU. I did several VDI projects where they were creating 3D drawings. In such cases implementing GPU is a no-brainer, because the 3D acceleration completely depends on it. You can read about one of those projects here. Those environments are not the ones that I would like to explain.
Looking back at projects starting with Windows Server 2012, users started to use more and more graphic intensive websites. They started consuming more video content like YouTube, online learning platforms, and websites that are more and more requiring GPU. Both Citrix and VMware developed solutions to keep giving the user the best UX without having to install graphics cards also. The downside of these software solutions is that everything is rendered using the CPU. That means you needed a faster (read: more expensive) CPU and when someone was using a graphics-intensive application, other users could start complaining that their system was slow. This all because the CPU couldn’t handle all requests fast enough.
VDI/SBC with GPU
And then came Nvidia, offering virtual GPUs (vGPU), where we could assign multiple VMs to one physical Graphics Card and give a portion of the card, this is called profiles. First, only Citrix supported this with Citrix Hypervisor (f.k.a. XenServer), and then also VMware supported this type of virtual GPUs. Nowadays we can create more VMs on the same physical server because we can assign more VMs to one GPU graphics card.
This all had a positive effect on the return on investment (ROI) for a VDI or SBC environment with GPU cards. Because of the profiles, we need both fewer physical servers and CPUs, resulting in less Rackspace, less maintenance, and fewer investments. Now we can start using the vGPU more often and help users get the best UX with the new and more graphics-intensive applications.
Almost always a GPU
Nowadays we almost always advise customers to buy GPUs for their VDI/SBC environment. We have a couple of reasons why we don’t advise GPUs:
- When they have a small number of VMs (≤ 4) and adding them to their already existing backend VMware environment. To use the GPU profiles, VMware requires the use of VMware vSphere Enterprise Plus. When customers don’t already have an Enterprise Plus license, it’s usually too expensive to add GPUs;
- That it’s just a temporary environment because they are migrating to local machines or the cloud.
- Usage, some customers are using the EUC environment just for some users or only when they have to work in remote offices. When this isn’t a daily situation, we can decide to only use CPU.
Based on the above pros and cons, you definitely need to consider GPUs when upgrading or migrating your VDI/SBC environment.
Can you do cost comparison of vGPU from AMD & NVIDIA on:
1. Latest version of Citrix Hypervisor
2. Latest version of VMWare ESXi
I think that’s not an easy question, you need to look at the business case to see what’s the best solution for you.
If I have a Business Case that’s asking me to make a comparison, I will update the article.